Check out the crazy story from The Washington Post below. The bottom line is you have to be careful what you post on the Internet.
On the other hand, the School Superintendent mentioned in this story might want to rethink their interviewing strategies. Asking a potential candidate about their age, citizenship, national origin, race/ethnicity, or marital status, is illegal in the United States. And this is all information which can very often be found near the top of any MySpace or Facebook page. I essentially see no difference between an interviewer asking "How old are you?" and "What is the web page which will tell me how old you are?" This is just a lawsuit waiting to happen.
read more | digg story
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Friday, April 04, 2008
Randi Rhodes
Air America Radio Host Randi Rhodes was recently suspended from her radio show for calling both Hillary Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro "whores" at a recent affiliate appearance. While Ms. Rhodes remarks were made off the air in a San Francisco nightclub, her appearance was filmed and the most sensational portion of her talk was placed on YouTube.
My take on this:
The suspension was justified. This is NOT a question about free speech. Randi Rhodes is free to go to any street corner in the country and shout any mean-spirited epithet at the top of her lungs. However, in this case, Ms. Rhodes was appearing an event sponsored by the local San Francisco Air America Radio affiliate. In my book, this means that she was on Air America's time and representing the network. And if I was the one doing this performance, I probably would have toned it down a little.
Look, I agree with Randi Rhodes a lot of the time, and I'm no big fan of Hillary Clinton or Geraldine Ferraro. However, Randi Rhodes went way too far. She could have made her points without calling those women "whores". She could have persuaded without being crass. You can definitely be passionate about what you believe in, but you don't have to present it in a vulgar way. Especially when you are essentially representing your employers.
Isn't the Democratic party supposed to be better than that?
If this would have been Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh getting up on a stage and making such disgusting comments, wouldn't we want some disciplinary action for them? Wouldn't we think that at least a suspension is warranted?
If so, we have to demand the same for Randi Rhodes.
My take on this:
The suspension was justified. This is NOT a question about free speech. Randi Rhodes is free to go to any street corner in the country and shout any mean-spirited epithet at the top of her lungs. However, in this case, Ms. Rhodes was appearing an event sponsored by the local San Francisco Air America Radio affiliate. In my book, this means that she was on Air America's time and representing the network. And if I was the one doing this performance, I probably would have toned it down a little.
Look, I agree with Randi Rhodes a lot of the time, and I'm no big fan of Hillary Clinton or Geraldine Ferraro. However, Randi Rhodes went way too far. She could have made her points without calling those women "whores". She could have persuaded without being crass. You can definitely be passionate about what you believe in, but you don't have to present it in a vulgar way. Especially when you are essentially representing your employers.
Isn't the Democratic party supposed to be better than that?
If this would have been Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh getting up on a stage and making such disgusting comments, wouldn't we want some disciplinary action for them? Wouldn't we think that at least a suspension is warranted?
If so, we have to demand the same for Randi Rhodes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)